“conventional views”

Standard
a conventional family judged by an old convention

a conventional family judged by an old convention

Richard Cohen explains how two people being married is icky in “conventional views“:

Today’s GOP is not racist, as Harry Belafonte alleged about the tea party, but it is deeply troubled — about the expansion of government, about immigration, about secularism, about the mainstreaming of what used to be the avant-garde. People with conventional views must repress a gag reflex when considering the mayor-elect of New York — a white man married to a black woman and with two biracial children. (Should I mention that Bill de Blasio’s wife, Chirlane McCray, used to be a lesbian?) This family represents the cultural changes that have enveloped parts — but not all — of America. To cultural conservatives, this doesn’t look like their country at all.

because one of those people is black and has been in same sex relationships before. racist and homophobic statement, all at once.

Remember he writes for Washington Post our nation’s pre-eminent political paper.

Veteran Greg Popovich on SNAP cuts denied vets food security

Quote

Veteran Greg Popovich on SNAP cuts denied vets food security:

“Just like the way it is right now – how many vets might have to do without food stamps because of what’s going on with the government right now? That program is huge to a lot of these families. I mean huge. It gets them through. And it may or may not be there – who knows? – because government is not very functional at this point, as we all know. So it’s a day to reflect, to honor but also to not lose sight of the fact that a whole lot more has to be done with what they’ve done for all of us.”

New theme

Aside

I switched to the new writr theme by wordpress.org makers Automattic. it mimics a genesis framework theme I had that i loved for a bit that was also a tumblog type format.

That’s not the biggest change. the biggest change is that the home page will no longer be blog posts. I will work on changing the homepage to support presentation of my writing and intro to the site. now it’s just the about page.

Like it leave a comment. Don’t like it? leave a comment. Don’t care, leave a comment.

Who knew being enslaved was so awful?

Standard
Richard Cohen thought the enslaved just liked heavy jewelry

Richard Cohen thought the enslaved just liked heavy jewelry

I would like to believe that the following passage would disqualify you as a political columnist:.

I sometimes think I have spent years unlearning what I learned earlier in my life. For instance, it was not George A. Custer who was attacked at the Little Bighorn. It was Custer — in a bad career move — who attacked the Indians. Much more important, slavery was not a benign institution in which mostly benevolent whites owned innocent and grateful blacks. Slavery was a lifetime’s condemnation to an often violent hell in which people were deprived of life, liberty and, too often, their own children. Happiness could not be pursued after that.

Steve McQueen’s stunning movie “12 Years a Slave” is one of those unlearning experiences. I had to wonder why I could not recall another time when I was so shockingly confronted by the sheer barbarity of American slavery. Instead, beginning with school, I got a gauzy version. I learned that slavery was wrong, yes, that it was evil, no doubt, but really, that many blacks were sort of content. Slave owners were mostly nice people — fellow Americans, after all — and the sadistic Simon Legree was the concoction of that demented propagandist, Harriet Beecher Stowe.

-Richard Cohen, Washington Post, November 4, 2013

Note: In addition, Custer wasn’t defeated by “Indians”, he was defeated by the Lakota Sioux and Northern Cheyenne.

paying $293 for next to no coverage is not better than $333 for silver coverage

Standard
Deborah Cavallaro in a promo for a get rich investment seminar. This should have helped her pay for a cadillac plan

Deborah Cavallaro in a promo for a get rich investment seminar. This should have helped her pay for a cadillac plan

Many of the Obamacare cancellation rate shock news reports have been vetted as well as a facebook post from the guy who sat next to you in junior year study hall. That is to say: not at all.

From LA Times’ Michael Hiltzik

I talked with Cavallaro, 60, after her CNBC appearance. Let’s walk through what she told me.

Her current plan, from Anthem Blue Cross, is a catastrophic coverage plan for which she pays $293 a month as an individual policyholder. It requires her to pay a deductible of $5,000 a year and limits her out-of-pocket costs to $8,500 a year. Her plan also limits her to two doctor visits a year, for which she shoulders a copay of $40 each. After that, she pays the whole cost of subsequent visits.

This fits the very definition of a nonconforming plan under Obamacare. The deductible and out-of-pocket maximums are too high, the provisions for doctor visits too skimpy.

As for a replacement plan, she says she was quoted $478 a month by her insurance broker, but that’s a lot more than she’ll really be paying. Cavallaro told me she hasn’t checked the website of Covered California, the state’s health plan exchange, herself. I did so while we talked.

Here’s what I found. I won’t divulge her current income, which is personal, but this year it qualifies her for a hefty federal premium subsidy.

[…]

The sad truth is that Cavallaro has been very poorly served by the health insurance industry and the news media. It seems that Anthem didn’t adequately explain her options for 2014 when it disclosed that her current plan is being canceled. If her insurance brokers told her what she says they did, they failed her. And the reporters who interviewed her without getting all the facts produced inexcusably shoddy work — from Maria Bartiromo on down. They not only did her a disservice, but failed the rest of us too.

via Another Obamacare horror story debunked – latimes.com.

Cavallaro wasn’t being swindled, but she was making a very high risk bet. She was betting $293 that:

  • she would only ever need 2 doctor appointments
  • $8500 of medical care costs in 2013

Catastrophic coverage is actually a misnomer, it doesn’t actually cover catastrophes! Or maybe having this type of coverage is catastrophic.

Cavallaro responded with an interview with Hugh Hewitt to maintain Obamacare is a raw deal for her. I won’t link to that jerk, but you can search “Hugh Hewitt Deborah Cavallaro” and find the “debunking” article. She tells Hewitt she can’t save with Obamacare and Hiltzik is wrong. Why? She doesn’t want to go on the California exchange and put in her personal information because then it will be in “cyberspace”.

Someone should remind Cavallaro that insurance companies have interwebs too! And sometimes they get hacked too! Cavallaro doesn’t want to use the exchanges (and she is in California where the exchanges work) for whatever reason, which is fine, but that means she is choosing the bad deal through her insurance broker over the better deal.

This is why the healthcare.gov problems really are causing major political issues for Obama: this becomes harder to prove since you have to log-in to shop! Part of having a store is marketing the products that can be bought. Healthcare.gov stymies that marketing and in being a broken, poorly designed insurance portal has aided Obamacare naysayers.

Right now, the administration is working on getting the site functional, but they need to find a way to get cost matrices to insureds who have had their policies canceled so they understand the more modest difference in cost and the better quality of service in real terms.

3% of americans may be worse off under ACA

Standard
Not 3% percent, also not on healthcare.gov

Not 3% percent, also not on healthcare.gov

Gruber further estimates that 80% of Americans will be “more or less left alone”, 14% will be “clear winners: they are currently uninsured and will have access to an affordable insurance policy”, and even half of the remaining 6% currently buying their own policies “will have little change to their policies”..

It’s that final 3% — people who “will have to buy a new product that complies with the A.C.A.’s more stringent requirements” — that’s given the media (and the GOP) a short-lived chance to try and discredit the whole program.

Read the whole thing (it’s not long) for more details.

via Three Percent: More ACA Wonkery » Balloon Juice.

Read more in Ryan Lizza’s New Yorker article:

Gruber summarized his stats: ninety-seven per cent of Americans are either left alone or are clear winners, while three per cent are arguably losers. “We have to as a society be able to accept that,” he said. “Don’t get me wrong, that’s a shame, but no law in the history of America makes everyone better off.”

With the folks with Cadillac plans who are

Berating the people that work for you

Standard
swearing at his employees is almost as offensive as Christie swearing in as President. almost.

swearing at political operatives is almost as offensive as Christie swearing in as President. almost.

Chris Christie has no problem yelling at the people that work for him.

The book describes Christie as concluding that Romney’s campaign team was “a gaggle of clowns who couldn’t organize a one-ring circus.” After Christie drew media criticism for his keynote address at the Republican National Convention, he confronted Romney adviser Ron Kaufman in the arena concourse and berated him with expletives.

“I’m tired of you people!!!” the book quotes Christie as saying. “Leave me the [expletive] alone!!!!”

I think Christie boosters love having a big boss man that they feel will yell at all the liberals. Little do they realize : he won’t stop with just liberals.