Former Admiral Joe Sestak on O’Reilly to discuss Holder’s 9/11 prosecutions in federal criminal court


US Representative Joe Sestak debunks the utility of torture, notes that as an Admiral he was in the Pentagon when the attacks occurred, that Bush 43’s military tribunals were incomplete and still believes that Article III of the US Constitution exists and has served as well.

O’Reilly is mad, that Zacarias Moussaoui was able to say nasty things about America, before he was convicted and sentenced to life in a super max prison by a jury in federal criminal court. O’Reilly says he “believes in the military” inferring that he is taking the paternalistic view that you can’t count on judges, federal prosecutors and juries comprised of American citizens.

O’Reilly also complains about it taking four years and “millions and millions of dollars” for Moussaoui to be detained and convicted. He obviously believes it is cheaper to detain and torture Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and other 9/11 co-conspirators for 6 years without any conviction.