Contraception Rules are part of the Affordable Care Act

Standard

Contraception is a health care debate.

In the fifth Swing States survey taken since last fall, Obama leads Republican front-runner Mitt Romney51%-42% among registered voters just a month after the president had trailed him by two percentage points.

The biggest change came among women under 50. In mid-February, just under half of those voters supported Obama. Now more than six in 10 do while Romney’s support among them has dropped by 14 points, to 30%. The president leads him 2-1 in this group.

[…]

Obama campaign manager Jim Messina says Romney’s promise to “end Planned Parenthood” — the former Massachusetts governor says he wants to eliminate federal funding for the group — and his endorsement of an amendment that would allow employers to refuse to cover contraception in health care plans have created “severe problems” for him in the general election.

Swing States Poll: A shift by women puts Obama in lead – USATODAY.com.

When they say most Americans want the Affordable Care Act aka “Obamacare” repealed. Most of these women who support access to contraception are some of the Americans probably don’t know that the contraception access rules the Obama Administration issued were part of that law.

Expert Voice Analysts say Zimmerman not person screaming for help on 911 call

Standard

The Orlando Sentinel contracted voice analysts to determine if Zimmerman’s voice could be reasonably expected to be the voice on the 911 call:

The Sentinel said it contacted Owen, who it described as a court-qualified expert witness and former chief engineer for the New York Public Library’s Rodgers and Hammerstein Archives of Recorded Sound. He told the newspaper he used software called Easy Voice Biometrics to compare Zimmerman’s voice to the 911 call screams.

Owen told the newspaper that the software compared the screams to Zimmerman’s voice and returned a 48 percent match. He said he would expect a match of higher than 90 percent, considering the quality of the audio.

“As a result of that, you can say with reasonable scientific certainty that it’s not Zimmerman,” Owen told the Sentinel.

But he also said he could not confirm the voice as Trayvon’s, because he didn’t have a sample of the teen’s voice.

The Sentinel said that Ed Primeau, a Michigan-based audio engineer and forensics expert, used audio enhancement and human analysis and came to the same conclusion.

via U.S. News – Trayvon Martin case audio: Screams were not George Zimmerman’s, 2 experts say.

 

Wolf Blitzer asks Romney about Hunger Games

Standard

This is an interview of Romney from one of CNN’s top journalists:

Leno did better:

In an exchange with Leno on the subject of healthcare, Romney once again displayed his lack of affinity with less-fortunate Americans. When Leno pressed him on salvaging from Obamacare the requirement for insurance companies to offer coverage to people with preexisting medical conditions, Romney made it quite clear he has little sympathy for people who get sick before they can afford to buy health insurance. He came close to Ron Paul’s notable let-them-die moment from one of the early debates of the GOP presidential campaign.

No. He didn’t come close, Romney did say “let them die”, he just said it in sanitized corporate double talk:

“People who have been continuously insured … then they get real sick and they happen to lose a job or change jobs, they find, gosh, I’ve got a pre-existing condition, I can’t get insured. I’d say, ‘no no no,'” he said Tuesday night on NBC’s “Tonight Show with Jay Leno.” “As long as you’ve been continuously insured, you ought to be able to get insurance going forward.”

A future USA without the Affordable Care Act aka “Obamacare”, which may be a reality with or without a Romney presidency, will have no regulation that says insurers have to cover pre-existing conditions. Without laws that compel private insurers to cover “high risk patients”, they won’t. He said “they ought to” be able to get insurance he didn’t promise to pass a law mandating that insurers enroll customers with “pre-existing conditions”. It’s non committal.

Romney’s statement makes no sense. Here is the definition of pre-existing condition:

Pre-Existing Condition – A medical condition that occurred before a program of health benefits went into effect.

How the f*ck can you be continuously insured if you have a condition before you have healthcare? Even if you are talking about people who had employer provided health insurance until they were laid off when their policy lapses, they are on their own. The existing HIPAA regulations before the ACA was passed were designed for say a person who left one employer based health care plan (that they had at least 18 months), and then enrolled in another employer based healthcare plan but maybe the new plan had a one to two month waiting period for health care. Then pre-existing condition denials were not permitted. Otherwise, insurance companies could deny anyone with any illness they deem as high risk.

In addition, there are pre-existing condition exclusions. Basically, you pay full price for health care, and enjoy insured access to all health care treatments except for the treatments that treat your pre-existing conditions for 12 to 18 months.

“…shot to death, allegedly, by this man”

Standard

Useless Neutrality: “…shot to death, allegedly, by this man…”

It’s not alleged if it’s undisputed, even by the shooter. Painfully neutral newscaster language is the worst, meant to least offend the sensibility at the expense of information. Zimmerman said he shot him. Witnesses said Zimmerman shot him. No one disputes that Zimmerman shot Martin in the chest. It’s not presumptuous or unfair to say Zimmerman shot Martin.

When a newscaster uses this language irrespective of the facts established and admissions of people involved it weakens the value of the news report.

I’m Late to the Game: No More Writely Addresses

Standard

I can send a document to my kindle (app/device) by e-mail.

I can send a document to my Evernote account.

I can’t send one to Google Docs by e-mail anymore. Used to be able to. Not anymore.

So, I basically found this out when trying to send something to my Google Docs writely address this past weekend (hadn’t used it in over a year). The address was useless. Google folks say they are working on improving the feature. Probably going to have to email a document to your circle before you upload it to Google docs.

Another “improvement”.

What far right media is doing to Trayvon Martin…

Standard

What the conservatives are doing can be explained very easily: they are looking through a dead kid’s journal, diary, dirty laundry and dresser drawers and then they are posting whatever they find, removed from context and absent of significance, for all to see.

2 AM, Fully belly, empty beer, great time to hit I-95, or I-76

Standard

A new entertainment complex in South Philadelphia to cater to sports fans and partiers everywhere (From Philly.com via Atrios):

Location is an advantage, Luukko said: Xfinity Live is accessible from I-95 and I-76 and is “less than a half-hour from Delaware, just over the Walt Whitman Bridge from New Jersey, seven minutes from Center City, and an easy drive from the suburbs.

“Xfinity Live will be open 365 days a year. Certain portions will be open for lunch, with the rest open by 4 p.m. and most attractions staying open until 2 a.m. Parking will be free on nonevent nights, starting Friday. On event days, it will be free one hour after the start of the final event.


One of the biggest problem, regional rail. Last regional commuter trains from Philly to suburbs leave center city between midnight and 12:30 AM on weekends. It doesn’t matter as the last train from AT&T station to Center City on weekends are around 12:45. So most attractions will be serving people springing for an expensive taxi ride or driving home.

Gov Haley in trouble

Standard

Another winner in the South Carolina Governor’s Mansion:

Yesterday, Palmetto Public Record exclusively reported that the Internal Revenue Service has been investigating since March of 2011 the Sikh worship center run by Gov. Haley’s father. At least five lawsuits have been filed against the Sikh Society of South Carolina since 2010, alleging that the group bilked contractors out of nearly $130,000 for the construction of a new temple.

Romney’s HaHa: Don’t remind them he laid ’em off! heyyoooo!

Standard

Romney laughs about some people his father laid off in Michigan:

The GOP frontrunner recalled a “humorous” anecdote to Wisconsin voters in a conference call about how his father, George Romney, closed an auto factory in Michigan during his businessman years only to go to great lengths to hide this fact from voters when he ran from governor in the same state. Not only that, he suggested this gave him a closer relationship to Wisconsin, the state where George Romney shipped his factory, in his own current campaign.

And what kind of health insurance for people who get laid off under a President Romney?…whatever you have, you should be able to have as long as you had it already.

Is this approach more or less popular than “Obamacare”, isn’t that the question that should be asked in polls?

Led by Anger

Standard

Trayvon Martin’s murder is just angering. I’m angry about:

I am angry. I’m trying to slow walk posts about it because I am so angry that I don’t want to state something that is immediately stupid or wrong just to support my personally desired outcome. (Also because bloggers like TNC , journalists like Charles Blow and Political Scientists like Melissa Harris-Perry are breaking this down better than I ever could.)

Most people who hear about Trayvon Martin’s death are angry. That anger could lead us to recklessness or vindictiveness or criminal cruelty and we all need to be careful about that.

Note: Think Progress has a strong run down of all the information in the order it breaks.

Why Florida Senate Democrats voted with Republicans on “Stand Your ground” law: “We’d be seen as Democrats soft on crime”

Standard

In looking back “Stand Your Ground Laws”. Florida House Democrats opposed it, Florida House and Senate Republicans supported it:

Gelber said Floridians already had the right to defend themselves in their homes and offered an amendment that would restore a person’s duty to retreat from a confrontation in public places. Rep. Eleanor Sobel, a South Florida Democrat who now serves in the Senate, said Gelber’s amendment would reduce “chaos on the street.”

Republicans defeated Gelber’s amendment on a voice vote. The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, called an obligation to retreat “a good way to get shot in the back.”

Members debated another unsuccessful amendment from Rep. Jack Seiler, a Democrat who is now mayor of Fort Lauderdale. Seiler’s proposal would have allowed for rebuttal to a person’s claim of self-defense.

“We are going to give blanket immunity to criminals when they commit crime,” Seiler said.

Other voices from the hour-long debate:

• “What would happen if I presumed that there was a threat when actually there was not a threat? I would hate to think that I would react and take someone’s life, or do bodily harm to someone, who actually only looked a little different than I looked,” said Rep. Priscilla Taylor, D-West Palm Beach.

• “When you give a person the right to use deadly force anywhere they’re lawfully supposed to be, then we open Pandora’s Box, and inside the box will be death for some persons,” Joyner said.

• “In a few years, you will be back trying to fix this bill,” said Rep. Ken Gottlieb, D-Hollywood.

What did Democrats in the Florida State Senate do? Voted for it (unanimously) because they were afraid to be seen as soft on crime:

Sen. Steve Geller, D-Hallandale Beach, tried changing the bill before the vote so that it would not apply to public places. The Senate voted down his amendment in minutes. The vote to pass the bill was then unanimous, with Democrats, including Sen. Rod Smith, currently chair of the Florida Democratic Party, voting yes.

“We’d be seen as Democrats soft on crime,” Geller explained, according to an account from the Associated Press.

The Florida House Democrats opposition has been validated by numerous poor law enforcement outcomes directly attributable to “stand your ground” laws. The Florida State Senate Democrats are basically useless here because they didn’t want to be against a bill that Police and prosecutor associations vehemently opposed.

In Florida, prosecutors and police associations opposed Stand Your Ground, to no effect. Since the law was passed, the number of “justifiable homicides” has tripled. Last year, according to the Tampa Bay Times, “twice a week, on average, someone’s killing was considered warranted.” This week, the state attorney in Tallahassee, Willie Meggs, told the Times, “The consequences of the law have been devastating around the state. It’s almost insane what we are having to deal with.” Gang members, drug dealers, and road-rage killers are, according to Meggs, all successfully invoking Stand Your Ground. “The person who is alive always says, ‘I was in fear that he was going to hurt me.’ … And the other person would say, ‘I wasn’t going to hurt anyone.’ But he is dead. That is the problem they are wrestling with in Sanford.”

So the logic here for Florida Senate Dems: We didn’t want to seem like soft on crime, so we let ourselves get punked into a bad law that even the Police and Prosecutors said would make crime worse and remove the ability to seek justice in violent crimes.

Romney’s Tall Tales

Standard

Mitt Romney’s allegation? Under Obama businesses can’t flourish:

And now, the President is trying to erase his record with rhetoric. Just the other day, he said, “We are inventors. We are builders. We are makers of things. We are Thomas Edison. We are the Wright Brothers. We are Bill Gates. We are Steve Jobs.”

That’s true. But the problem is: he’s still Barack Obama. And under this President, those pioneers would have faced an uphill battle to innovate, invent, and create.

Under Dodd-Frank, they would have struggled to get a loan from their community bank.

A regulator would have shut down the Wright Brothers for their “dust pollution.”

And the government would have banned Thomas Edison’s light bulb. Oh, that’s right. They just did.

The real cost of these misguided policies are the ideas that are never pursued and the dreams that are never realized. 

For centuries, the American Dream has meant the opportunity to build something new. Some of America’s greatest success stories are people who started out with nothing but a good idea and a corner in their garage. But today, Americans who want to start a new business or launch a new venture don’t see promise and opportunity. They see government standing in their way.

 

So. Jobs. Gates. Wright. Edison. Building things. Let’s see:

Apple. Most profitable company. Ever.

Microsoft. Record earnings for Q2, FY 2011-2012.

GM. Record profit in 2011. the highest profit in 103-years of business.

Chrysler. 2011 was first full year of profitable quarters since 2005

Boeing. Beat expectations for 2011

Wall Street. Earned more under Obama’s time in office than during Bush’s two terms

GE. Profits up for 2011. Strong 2012 outlook.

Yes. Obama is anti-business until you look at how business has done under him.

Santorum’s 1860 Reference

Standard

Santorum said that 2012 is the most important election since 1860:

Obviously, it’s — so many memories come to mind when we walk on here in the town and across the street where Abraham Lincoln finished the Gettysburg Address at the Wills House. And you think about the great elections of our past.

And I’ve gone around this country over the past year now and said this is the most important election in our lifetimes. And, in fact, I think it’s the most important election since the election of 1860.

The election in 1860 was about whether these united states — which is what it was mostly referred to prior to the election of 1860 — would become the United States, whether it would be a union, a country bound together to build a great and prosperous nation, a — a nation based on a concept, a concept that we were birthed with, a concept birthed with our founding document of the Declaration of Independence.

I’ve said throughout the course of this campaign that while other issues are certainly important — the economy, joblessness, national security concerns, the family, the issue of life — all of these issues are important, but the foundational issue in this race, the one that is, in fact, the cause of the other maladies that we are feeling, whether it’s in the economy or whether it’s in the budget crisis that we’re dealing with, all boils down to one word, and that’s what’s at stake in this election, and it’s right behind me on that banner, and that’s the word “freedom.”

The election of 1860, the election that resulted in Republican Abraham Lincoln elected to the Presidency. In response to this election, southern, slaveholding states formed the Confederate States of America in March of 1861 to protect “slaveholder’s rights”. The Declaration of the state of Texas, upon joining the Confederate States also cited an alleged failure of the federal government to protect it’s frontier border. Confederate forces fired on Fort Sumter and began the Civil War.

This is a very serious philosophical position here. Since he referred to Lincoln, I think Santorum is inferring that he believes Barack Obama as a 21st century some sort of James Buchanan in his eyes: allowing some sort of egregious deprivation of freedom to be visited upon Americans by passing federal reforms like the Affordable Care Act and Dodd-Frank financial reform. This is some kind of revisionist talk.

Abraham Lincoln wanted to save the Union. He believed in a republican (little R intended) government and argued against popular sovereignty during and after Gingrich’s favorite Lincoln-Douglas debates:

Lincoln predicted that a future Supreme Court decision might build on the timbers already laid by “declaring that the Constitution of the United States does not permit a State to exclude slavery from its limits.” Lincoln repeated the charge of nationalization and conspiracy in the first debate at Ottawa. “Popular Sovereignty, as now applied to the question of slavery, does allow the people of a Territory to have slavery if they want to, but does not allow them not to have it if they do not want it.” [27 – Johannsen, Lincoln-Douglas Debates, 14–15, 18–19, 55]

[…]

In part, Douglas accomplished this by defining the American Revolution as a struggle for local self-government within the empire. Douglas maintained that the local emphasis had continued under the Constitution. He construed the constitutional clause giving Congress authority over the territories to be limited strictly to land sales and not to government. Congress thus had no power to interfere in the “internal policy, either of the States or of the Territories.” Therefore Congress could neither impose slavery nor prohibit it in either states or territories.

Santorum and his fellow GOP primary candidates have mostly argued for popular sovereignty under the guise of states rights and that should be remembered when he seeks to put himself on the side of Lincoln, preserver of the Union.

The women in Santorum’s life do not improve his voting record or campaign promises

Standard

“I can’t be racist, I have black friends” has reared its ugly head again. On Morning Joe, Scarborough and his crew were peddling the lie that women would have nothing to fear because Santorum is surrounded by strong women. That’s great.

It’s not how he treats them that matters, it’s the laws he would pass and did vote for the rest of the women in the country.

Judge him by his actions before you judge him by the company he keeps.

West Philly Cop’s twitter feed

Standard

There may be unintended negative consequences to this Philly cops neighborhood feed, but in leiu of cops walking the beat and getting to know the people they police face to face, the Southwest Philly Cop Joe Murray’s twitter feed seemed like a good, if not very good, development (From Philebrity) for Community Policing:

Joseph Murray, a detective in the Southwest Division, has been tweeting crime alerts, tips, and news directly to citizens for around two years. But recently, according to the Inquirer, his twitter account has been silent because of a rule inside the PPD requiring officers to, “get departmental permission before using their official titles on social-media sites.”

I think he may have innovated a communication method that can help police you know, be trusted members of the community (From the Inquirer article linked above):

Murray opened up his Twitter account in 2009 – 9143 is his badge number – and sees it as just another way to build trust and arm people with information.

“My goal was for people to actually know me – a detective they could pick up the phone and call,” he said.

[…]

He provides updates and information after violent crimes, like murders, and posts suspect photos and invites tips to his private e-mail.

[…]

In September, residents around 48th and Springfield, a neighborhood of stately Victorians, whose inhabitants include many professionals and students, held a meeting after the rape and robbery of a couple coming home from dinner. The residents invited Murray, whom they knew from Twitter.

[…]

“It makes no sense to me to watch sitting ducks walk into a robbery pattern that I know about but they don’t,” he said.

I think this is an efficient and smart innovation. Residents have a petition up in favor of Murray’s tweets and the PPD has responded and said Murray’s twitter updates will be back soon.

Do you really want to do that?

Standard

Call me crazy, but I am pretty sure Chris Rock is more popular than these clowns. Does this clown Jason Mattera really want to push Chris Rock to write material about tea partiers, right wingers and these stupid ambush, selectively edited films? They’d be better off letting him riff than write.

The major punk move here is coming up all: hey I’m a big fan, let’s take a picture and then jumping into some ambush interview. If you want to talk to the man about politics, represent yourself fairly and ride that way. This guy Mattera and others like him obviously want to jump in someones face and get them pissed off and then release a video that is: Star A gets angry at Hollywood event X at innocent reporter from Z to the right wing base.

Romneybot Laws

Standard

TPM Breaks down the programming behind Romneybot 2012:

Taken together, all three proposals follow a clear pattern. Step one: Take a popular conservative idea (Medicare vouchers, tax cuts, bankruptcy for failing companies). Step two: Leave out a critical piece of information (subsidy levels, spending cuts, federal aid). Step three: Emphasize whichever step works best with the audience in question.

 

Everyone’s well within their rights

Standard

This is the testimony of 30 year old law student Sandra Fluke before the Democratic members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Women’s Health and Contraception . The most important part is that oral contraception, “the pill”, has a variety of uses that improve the quality of life for women regardless of their sexual activity. In addition to allowing women to have more control over their reproductive health birth control is prescribed to treat Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Endometriosis andPremenstrual dysphoric disorder. Under Georgetown’s Insurance plan, these are not covered. Here is the opening statement to Fluke’s testimony:

The full hearing can be watched at CSPAN here.

To start: Limbaugh did not just insult Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke and women who use contraception in passing. He repeatedly asserted any woman whose contraception is covered by insurance through Georgetown University’s insurance program is a poly-amorous freeloading sex addicted slut by way of prostitution that should be required to star in pornography freely available to tax payers as fair exchange for adequate reproductive health coverage. He directly defamed Fluke repeatedly over three days by making all of the same claims about her directly and mis-representing her testimony to his audience. ThinkProgress compiled the bad choices of words:

His apology was a lesson in how not to say “i’m sorry”. He has every right to say these things under the 1st amendment. He really does. He also has a right to attempt to profit from what he says. He doesn’t have a right to be profitable. That’s why this defense of Limbaugh mounted by Bill Maher on his HBO show Real Time With Bill Maher under the auspices of free speech is off base.

Limbaugh hosts a radio show for a syndicated radio network. Advertisers want to sell products to Limbaugh’s listeners and other consumers so they buy ad space from Limbaugh’s syndicate. If consumers find out that an advertiser has business relationships or business practices they don’t like, they can ask that advertiser to choose between their consumer buying power and whatever gain they seek through existing business relationships or practices. Limbaugh and his attacks on Fluke and women are indeed free speech, but to advertisers Limbaugh’s shows are a guaranteed audience for their sales pitch. He trades listeners attentions for his speech, and then he sells a share of his listeners attention to advertisers. That has a finite value to advertisers. The groups petitioning Limbaugh’s advertisers are giving them a simple choice: choose between access to their dollars or Limbaugh’s audience’s dollars. Advertisers made a shrewd business decision to not run afoul of the sensibilities of millions of men and women (the lead consumers in most households) who support contraception coverage, find President Obama’s compromise proposal reasonable and don’t take kindly to Limbaugh’s bullying of Sandra Fluke. Limbaugh isn’t getting bullied out of free speech. He’s just losing commercial subsidy for that speech.

No one has attacked Limbaugh’s rights. He can still say whatever he likes. He can still (and he will) attempt to profit from that speech. He can search for willing advertisers or switch to other business models to generate his income. He can go to a subscription/pay per view online model or just broadcast his show for free. He doesn’t have a right to keep advertisers if those folks feel like ad buys on Limbaugh’s show would erode their brand. In fact, withholding economic support is exactly Bill Maher’s reasoning for not staying at Trump hotels:

“I used to stay at the Trump [hotels] and I just wouldn’t now. The people were great, but I wouldn’t stay at a ‘birther’ hotel.” -Bill Maher

Trump talks about Obama on his YouTube channel or to ticket holders at wig nut conferences, and Maher feels the need to boycott Trumps hotel product as a kind of personal protest. So Maher won’t stay at a “birther” hotel because of what Donald Trump says about Obama’s heritage, but thinks people shouldn’t demand that their hard earned money not support sexist Limbaugh. Maher also quotes the ACLU regarding free speech but ignores the fact that the ACLU supports boycotts.

I think Maher still smarts from being pushed off of ABC’s Politically Incorrect (P.I.) by a boycott led by people who were upset Maher insisted that 9/11 attackers were evil but they were not cowards. However wrong headed, those people had a right to organize a petition and pressure his advertisers. ABC had a right to cancel P.I.. (In my personal opinion ABC should have stood up for P.I., as Maher was making a nuanced point about ascribing stereotypes to real life villains, but it is their right to say they didn’t want to take up that ideological battle on Maher’s behalf . Their job is to drive ratings up to make ad space more valuable. Maher’s show was part of their advertisement sponsored entertainment business that could no longer command the same ad buys.

Maher still was able to say whatever he wanted to, it’s just that ABC wasn’t willing to sell ad buys associated with Maher’s speech to advertisers anymore. Limbaugh and Maher’s rights were/are fully intact. What Maher is speaking out against is the same leverage that civil rights activists used during the Montgomery Bus Boycotts or the Delano Grape strike, he’s on the wrong side of free expression. Yes, it’s the same leverage right wingers used against Maher and Greta Van Susteren used against Louis C.K.. But, boycotts are not without consequences (often contrary to the organizers intents). Maher secured a more insulated post at HBO and quite frankly, I think like Imus, Limbaugh will find a way to insulate his profits going forward finding advertisers who are happy to focus their marketing towards his and other syndicated right wing talkers audiences. I think those boycotting Limbaugh simply want to immediately prevent their money from directly helping Limbaugh profit from his free speech. Everyone’s well within their rights.