Andrew Sullivan thinks Rand Paul wants to lower government debt and may even think about a tax hike at some time during his six year senate term so we should…hear him out.
If he’s serious, he’ll compromise to get real change, even if it means some tax hikes. If he’s unserious, he’ll keep posturing. But give him a chance.
via Rands Win, Ctd – The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan.
What kind of politician is Sullivan insisting that we give a chance? Well let’s look at one of his positions… (bold is mine)
He said he was, however, concerned about the future of Appalachia due to what he feels is an attempt to restrict coal use by President Obama.
He explained, “Every time you want to mine coal, you must get a permit, and basically, Obama has slowed the process because he’s very anti-coal… if you interview any spokesman for the different coal companies, they’ll tell you they are very worried… I think that’s the biggest problem facing Appalachia right now.”
Rand Paul would not just be trying to bring spending restraint to the Senate. He is a right wing radical who has stated his position on a variety of issues. Rand Paul believes the biggest problem facing the thousands of Appalachia coal miners and the 29 workers that died in the death trap that was Upper Big Branch Coal Mine in West Virginia, run by the despicable Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship, is the permit process was too slow and prevented Blankenship from mining coal. Here is the truth about mining Permits…
In the federal register for August 28, 2000, there’s record that Performance Coal Company—a Massey subsidiary—was approved for a permit modification to use belt ventilation in their Upper Big Branch Mine-South
Belt air ventilation is a method in which air used to ventilate a mine runs through the same area where coal is exiting on a conveyor belt. It was specifically outlawed in the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. Now, if companies want to use the system, they have to petition for a permit modification.
Jerry Tien is a professor of mining engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He says one of the concerns about belt air is that it runs over the coal being transported out of the mine. The conveyor belt is a dusty area, and coal can release methane.
via Upper Big Branch used ventilation system with a history of problems – WVPubcast.org.
10 years ago, Massey was allowed to use an illegal ventilation system for its mines, because Massey requested that privilege, and never addressed even basic modifications to make the mine ventilation system safer. The federal, state and local governments routinely bend the rules to allow business to do whatever the hell they want. This continues today. Obama appointee Joe Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health, and his predecessors did not hold Massey and other big coal companies accountable to the standards on the books. The weak permit system and enforcements allowed the Upper Big Branch accident to happen.
“This is a case not only of the operator thumbing his nose at the strictly legal requirements and regulations,” Ken Hechler, former West Virginia congressman who was lead sponsor of a 1969 law that overhauled mining safety, said this week in a phone interview. “It also involves a failure of the Mine Safety and Health Administration itself to act aggressively against the mine in order to ensure that either the conditions be made safe, as provided in the law, or to toughen the enforcement … to close the mine.”
Virginia-based Massey Energy, which owns the Upper Big Branch, “has a long history of having used every possible loophole to avoid the piling up of fines,” Hechler added, “which, of course, should have given the authority — which is clearly contained in the law — for [MSHA] to have closed that mine.”
A former MSHA manager echoed that sentiment this month, telling TWI that MSHA leaders — notably Joe Main, who heads the agency — haven’t done nearly enough to confront coal companies that show patterns of safety violations.
“[MSHA] was soft-pedaling — staying in the background, keeping a low profile,” the former official said. “And you can’t do that with this industry. You’ve got to use a big stick — especially with Massey.”
via Plenty of Blame Still to Go Around in Massey Mining Disaster « The Washington Independent.
So its not really true that Obama has been the bane of the coal industry. The Obama Administration has made some regulatory noise, but had very little bite behind its bark. What Rand Paul really believes is that the US government should abolish the EPA and MSHA and never attempt to make the MSHA get serious about regulating dangerous labor and safety practices of dastardly CEOs like Blankenship.
Paul also believes the Civil Rights Act goes too far because it prevents private businesses from discriminating against protected classes (race, color, religion, sex, national origin or physical impairment, age, sexual orientation). Watch it all.
Ta-Nehisi Coates addresses Rand Paul’s position that private business should be able to discriminate as their owners may see fit.
But what about red-lining? Does Paul know anything about blockbusting? Does he think banks should be able to have a policy of not lending to black businesses? Does he think real-estate agents should be able to discriminate? Does he think private homeowner groups should be able to band together and keep out blacks? Jews? Gays? Latinos?
I think there’s this sense that it’s OK to be ignorant about the Civil Rights Act because it’s a “black issue.” I’m not a lawyer, but my sense is that for a senator to be ignorant of the Civil Rights Act, is not simply to be ignorant of a “black issue,” but to be ignorant of one of the most important pieces of legislation ever passed. This isn’t like not knowing the days of Kwanzaa, this is like not knowing what caused the Civil War. It’s just embarrassing–except Paul is too ignorant to be embarrassed.
via The Proud Ignorance of Rand Paul – Politics – The Atlantic.
And let’s be clear, Paul wants to starve government and privatize as much as possible and replace government agency with private enterprise. In Paul’s ideal USA, the Civil Rights Act would be modified to allow these private businesses to discriminate as they see fit. He’s too radical a candidate to get a benefit of the doubt, a minute to explain or a chance. You cannot infer from Paul’s stated positions that there is any willingness to compromise.
Should we be looking to cut the budget deficit as our economy is becomes or is somewhat stabilized? In my opinion, yes. It is still absurd for Sullivan to ask for Paul to get further fair hearing. He has been heard, and if you review Paul’s complete ideology, not just one (temporarily) favorable platform point, you can see he is an establishment far right Republican. Not some principled Republican who seeks a sane and coherent public policy.
Continue reading