Ribbon UI still in Office? Not worth the trouble.

Standard

The “Ribbon UI” (what I would call the “Tabbed Ribbon UI”) is miserable. It’s been miserable since they rolled it out in Office 2007 and makes me dread any new office products . Microsoft threw out interface conventions everyone was comfortable with and then introduced a brand new user interface that requires significant learning for experienced users to access common features. Even more frustrating is that one tab can have it’s own separate ribbon format and orientation (the e.g. the File tab in Microsoft Office). New and old users were all new to the “Tabbed Ribbon UI” in 2007 and they blew it. I also work mainly on a notebook at home and that means already limited screen space is wasted by a bunch of commands I never or rarely use placed to obscure all the commands I like use often.

It was enough to permanently move me to try other Office suites (Open Office and Google Docs). I use Google Docs and now I only use Microsoft Office sparingly at work (Excel and Word) and occasionally at home (say on the rare occasion someone only has Word and needs a document from me). With additional scripting capability added to Google Docs, I am extremely comfortable using it as my main Office suite.

As long as the “Tabbed Ribbon UI” is implemented in the current fashion, I will continue to use Microsoft Office products less and less.

Space Exploration First: Voyager Reaches Edge of our Solar System

Standard

Thirty-five years ago, NASA launched a pair of spacecraft called Voyager 1 and 2 in hopes of learning more about the outer planets of solar system, those big gas giants. The Voyagers beamed back dazzling close-ups of the big red spot on Jupiter and the rings of Saturn, but scientists wanted to see even more of what’s out there, see how far the Voyagers could go before running out of fuel.

source: Voyager 1 Bids Farewell to the Solar System : NPR.

A fantastic achievement for NASA.

Apple’s iOS Maps quits Google Maps

Standard

Google has allowed this to happen by:

1. not cultivating a better relation with Apple as a top vendor for Google Maps through iOS Maps (eg denying Apple turn by turn)

2. not having their own Google Maps app for iOS in anticipation of Apple’s switch

It seems they can only fix the latter. Google already has native Earth, Latitude, Places and Zagat apps for iOS, they should be kicking themselves for not being ready to roll out a separate native Google Maps app ASAP. To me that would be worth the marketing on the level of their Chrome browser campaign. I hope they are working on it ASAP. Competition is always better for the users and although Google Maps mobile web version now includes a full set of features, the Google Search App for iOs is a lazy “all of the bookmarks above” linking App.

No street View or Public transit for iOS vs No iOS user data for Google:

So apparently, with iOS6b Maps there is neither street view nor transit directions for all devices. The real immediate punch in the gut for Google is that it does need access to the millions of Apple iOS (ipad, iphone, ipod touch) map users they no longer have access to as a result of this change. I doubt the newly Google+’ed Zagat app or Places will replace what all these users loved about iOS maps using Google Maps API or what Android users love about the awesome Maps application on Android. Traffic updates partially depend on active map users and without a bunch of iOS map users, Google’s traffic quality may deteriorate (although I think they user other geo-mapping services like NAVTEQ and/or TANA (aka Tom Tom) to supply real time traffic info as well).

Transit is a must have for me in Philadelphia, in the North East and when travelling. I am going to use it today to go to a graduation party, not just to know what Regional line I am getting on (you learn the lines fairly easily), but to know the exact time I need to walk out of my house and to the nearest Regional Rail stop. I used it on the Muni in San Francisco to go from the Mission District to the Ferry Building or to take the train from the airport to downtown. I guess they believe most iOS public transit riders will just use the excellent HopStop in conjunction with iOS6b Maps in the meantime. Even then Street View still helps me finish off these trips in full confidence. It’s a big feature deficit.

Full iOS 6 is only on iPad 2 and up and iPhone 4s, Meanwhile Google’s Maps are more accurate and precise

In addition, you have to have Siri to have turn by turn, so neither of my iOS devices (iPad 1G, iPod touch 32G) will be eligible for that. That is fine, but just saying this is a major phase out of those devices and that gives Google an opportunity to develop a native, full featured maps and directions app that can operate on all iOS6 devices, not just iPad 2 and up and iPhone 4S. 3D is beautiful, but I don’t fly a helicopter, street view is the 3D vantage point I desire and 3D is only on iPad 2 and up and iPhone 4s regardless.

In the end, even when looking at the detail of the actual street maps, Google Maps on Android is the one product on my Android phone and tablet, still running Android 2.x, that is still far superior to the Apple offering (and iOS maps with Google Maps is also better). The features I would get from Maps on an iOS6b device are “look at my swag” not “look how dependent I am on this” features. Especially when Google is finally adding offline maps (a feature Nokia’s Map’s have had for a while).

Remember Blackberry used to be undisputed king of corporate e-mail?

Google is the mobile Maps king, but Apple is selling too many new and fully upgrade-able devices that won’t feed data to Google Maps when iOS6b hits for any current supremacy in the Maps department minus involvement in the default Maps app to be any consolation to Google. Over 95% of Android users have never used the latest Android version “ice cream sandwich” after months after release while 61% of iOS device users were on the latest version two weeks after it was released. That means when iOS6 drops, 2 weeks or so later, 60+% users of iOS devices will no longer have Google Maps while 90%+ of Android users will be using an OS designed for 2 years ago. If Google wants to continue to rule Maps they need to have an actual Google Maps app in the iTunes store before most users forget the difference or Apple’s Maps App gets enough features post beta that it makes iOS users forget they ever needed a map from Google.

I want Search results, I get Ads

Standard

Google’s search product is becoming less valuable by the day:

Surrounding that link are nine ads, plus a link to a PetMeds user account at Google+. There are 10 links to Google services at the top of the page. Below that is my Google+ profile picture (which leads to my Google+ account settings) and a big Share box.

That’s a total of 23 links on that page, as it appears on a typical computer. Only one is a search result.

At Google, advertising is crowding out search results | Ed Bott.

I want Ice Cream Sandwich, I get Google Play

Standard

I like my Android phone because I like having a keyboard for Texting, adding calendar items, contacts and the like. I can thumb the keys without looking. I tried the Samsung Galaxy Tab, it was miserable. iPad has no competition. My G2 was nice in 2010. It sucks today, not because I dislike the form factor or general performance, because the phones OS and default tools are stuck in a 2010/2011 limbo.

But today, I’m supposed to be happy about Android Market and some other Apps being called something else.

Today we’re eliminating all that hassle with Google Play, a digital entertainment destination where you can find, enjoy and share your favorite music, movies, books and apps on the web and on your Android phone or tablet. Google Play is entirely cloud-based so all your music, movies, books and apps are stored online, always available to you, and you never have to worry about losing them or moving them again.

Introducing Google Play: All your entertainment, anywhere you go | Official Google Blog.

Digital entertainment destination? STFU. If it’s one destination, how is it that my G2 and Galaxy Tab downloaded and updated three Apps today: Music, Movies and Videos are now Google Play Music, Google Play Movies, Google Play Videos.

So yet again, like when all of Google’s services were plus-ified, Google is re-branding a bunch of stuff I already use, and then pushing an update to me and every other user with some annoying interface changes. My Samsung Galaxy Tab and G2 are already upgraded. I’ve used all those services on my Android phone and/or tablet. Have used, not continue to use (big difference). This won’t make me a regular user of any of them (iTunes, Netflix and Kindle instead). I buy in Google Music, download it and then sync it with iTunes. I tried using Google Music for a week and it just was too clunky of an interface. There is no way to keep songs on my phone or tablet, so listening is dependent upon my psuedo 4G/3G connection or wi-fi access. Meanwhile, my G2 is so very two years ago.

Google Chrome is my favorite browser. To me, the others don’t compete. As a windows laptop user at home and work, it’s a great choice for me. I have Google’s phone, and I can’t use it on my phone. Not even an old version. I don’t have Ice Cream Sandwich, the only Android version with Chrome. Instead, I’m stuck with their default browser app named “Browser”. Using it is worse than than not browsing at all. It’s a piece of garbage. But I have Google Play now, which means nothing new or improved to me, just more inconvenience.

If Google Play came today after Ice Cream Sandwich came last month, I wouldn’t care. I would be unimpressed, but I wouldn’t be annoyed right now. But I am annoyed because hackers last years put ICS on T-Mobile G2’s and stabilized it while my carrier takes their sweet time and Google hasn’t figured out how to “de-fragment” the Android user base.

MS Office for iPad: If it is less it will be more to me

Standard

Best thing about the app driven mobile revolution (starting with Apple’s iPod) is that it made computing so much simpler for the average user. Microsoft seemed to get that (much better than Google did and later) with their simple, take it as you see it metro interface for Windows mobile. (Frankly, I like the Metro graphical user interface a bit better than the iOS interface and loads better than the android graphical user interface.)

The thing I don’t like about office products: the menus. I don’t need to mail merge, no one I know uses it on a regular basis and yet…the menus went from being cluttered toolbars with small icons to cluttered tabbed toolbars with even more icons. Its confusing to see, I consistently forget where certain buttons functions are. I hate using Outlook 2010. I don’t need that many options 99.9999%, most outlook users don’t need that many options 99.9999% of the time so they shouldn’t be in front of my face 100% of the time. I hope they’ve learned that prior to releasing Office for iPad or they are pretty much wasting their time.

DOJ anti-trust unit targets Intel, Apple, Google, Adobe and others for skilled labor wage fixing

Standard

Tech Crunch has the story:

The evidence states that the defendants agreed not to poach employees from each other or give them offers if they voluntarily applied, and to notify the current employers of any employees trying to switch been. They also agreed not to enter into bidding wars and to limit the potential for employees to negotiate for higher salaries.

In one particularly juicy piece of evidence from May 2005, Adobe’s CEO Bruce Chizen emailed Steve Jobs regarding “Recruitment of Apple Employees”. In the message, Adobe’s SVP for human resources writes “Bruce and Steve Jobs have an agreement that we are not to solicit ANY Apple employees, and vice versa.”

Additionally, documents state that there is “strong evidence that the companies knew about the other express agreements, patterned their own agreements off of them, and operated them concurrently with the others to accomplish the same objective.”

For example, Lori McAdams of Pixar wrote an internal email to others at Pixar in April 2007 stating, “I just got off the phone with Danielle Lambert [of Apple], and we agreed that effective now, we’ll follow a Gentleman’s agreement with Apple that is similar to our Lucasfilm agreement.”

In business a “Gentleman’s agreement” is usually an agreement to screw everyone not considered a gentleman.

US Court rulings already resulting in SOPA domain seizures

Standard

Domain seizures are already happening as result of court orders against alleged “counterfeiters”:

After a series of one-sided hearings, luxury goods maker Chanel has won recent court orders against hundreds of websites trafficking in counterfeit luxury goods. A federal judge in Nevada has agreed that Chanel can seize the domain names in question and transfer them all to US-based registrar GoDaddy. The judge also ordered “all Internet search engines” and “all social media websites”—explicitly naming Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Bing, Yahoo, and Google—to “de-index” the domain names and to remove them from any search results.

[…]

“The fight against SOPA [the Stop Online Piracy Act] may be a red herring in some ways,” he notes, “since IP plaintiffs are fashioning very similar remedies in court irrespective of the legislation. Thus, even if SOPA is defeated, it may turn out to be a Pyrrhic victory—opponents may win the battle but may not have gained much as a result.”

via US judge orders hundreds of sites “de-indexed” from Google, Facebook

Adobe, Apple, Microsoft support awful SOPA through BSA.

Standard

We can, however, show that it does. And somewhat disingenuously, if I may. You see, Microsoft is a major player in the Business Software Alliance, along with Apple and 27 other companies. And the BSA supports SOPA. This is from a recent BSA bulletin:

The Business Software Alliance today commended House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) for introducing the “Stop Online Piracy Act” (H.R. 3261) to curb the growing rash of software piracy and other forms of intellectual property theft that are being perpetrated by illicit websites.

via 29 Tech Companies Back SOPA

Good bye mobile flash

Standard

Dumping Flash will make Android better, it will make BlackBerrys better, it will make the entire web better. iOS users have been benefitting from this ever since day one, in June 2007.

via Daring Fireball Linked List: Everybody Wins.

So very true. Flash is the earliest grave for websites. It’s overused by lazy web developers who want to impress unwitting clients. With HTML 5 and JQuery and Microsoft abandoning Silverlight, hopefully developers rely on it less and less.

“We invented the remix” aka patenting “Slide to Unlock”

"We Invented the Remix"
Standard
"We Invented the Remix"

"We Invented the Remix" - P. Diddy's dubious claim...not patented.

Niall Ferguson gets credit from Sully for innovating a new form because he innovated a new name for the form with nothing novel added:

Stay tuned. But here’s my old friend Niall Ferguson innovating a new form: the op-vid.

via Ask Andrew Everything – The Dish | By Andrew Sullivan – The Daily Beast.

I can think of a few folks who have “innovated” this new form already. With Ferguson’s new op-vid it’s not a big deal. The validating authority is Sullivan’s widely read, reader and colleague critiqued opinion blog. Someone will most probably write in to tell him he’s wrong.

Apple’s patent of “slide to unlock” is another issue. All this patent allows Apple to do is own rights to a technology they did not truly innovate:

In other words, this patent never should have been granted, and it used the almost always questionable “continuation” process to patent something fairly common, with lots of prior art. Good thing the patent reform bill that recently passed doesn’t touch on any of this stuff.

So the company with money to hire the most patent lawyers has the inside track on the future of American industry. Not the company that actually developed and deployed the technology first. This makes the USPTO a regressive force in the world of software development.

Done with Google Reader

Standard

I use a lot of Google products. Search. Gmail. Docs. Android 3.x on two devices. Maps. Navigation. Google+. Google Voice. GChat. One of my favorite was Google Reader through Google.com in Chrome browser (primarily), apps on my T-Mobile G2 (secondarily) and occasionally on my iPad 1 through the Google App and Samsung Galaxy Tab Tablet.

From the 1st to the 20th of October, I used Google Reader through all these channels this much:

From your 220 subscriptions, over the last 30 days you read 7,832 items, clicked 543 items, starred 140 items, shared 2,454 items, and emailed 88 items.

Since May 29, 2009 you have read a total of 300,000+ items.

Those shared items are there for an express reason. I use the aggregate of those shared items to populate the “recommended reads” list on my blog. I use(d) the share button to do two things:

  • “Share” to my voluntary Google Reader followers (share)
  • Curate my sources into an RSS feed (that is this blog’s recommended reading list (share)
Along with some other features I find (found rather) extremely valuable about the product:
  • Sharing with notes. i could share an article without just saying: read this. I could say read this and leave a note saying “beware of graphic content”. Or I could say read this and leave a note saying: “I think whatever this person is saying is b.s. and here’s why”. (share with notes)
  • The other functionality I use is the “Send” function which allows me forward articles a list of e-mail recipients. (send)
  • Read the Curated “share” lists of my “Followers”. (“Friends” feeds”)
  • Tags as feeds: Tagged folders were also feeds.
Using Google Reader in this manner I amassed all of 20 some followers directly. Google Reader is going to disable the current Google Reader Sharing Functionality and replace it with Google+’s +1 button. They tell me: this is better. Reasons I don’t like Google’s sea change:
  • Sharing is not Distributing: Sharing is opening up to the public and passive, +1 is distribution to a private list and active. Anyone can stumble across what I have shared.
  • Distribution is hardest to disrupt: There are already mailing lists, online groups/message boards and social networking groups to facilitate this communication. I have no interest in going through thousands of contacts and creating a copy of these groups so I can use Google+.
  • “+1” doesn’t mean what Google wants it to: +1 will be awful, inaccurate terminology to use for something I would “share”. It’s the same problem with “like”. I can definitely share something I don’t like.

It’s like Netflix anouncing that less selection and less delivery options from the same service for a higher price as an improvement to the end user. And yes, there is a price. My favorite features of the platform are gone and Google wants me to become contact secretary for my followers (yet again) in Google Reader. They are gone today, but this is how Google’s Reader Team sees it this way: “We think the end result is better than what’s available today, and you can sign up for Google+ right now to start prepping Reader-specific circles”.

This is an arrogant statement born of a belief that I won’t take my news reading elsewhere or the belief that they are sure that in sharing all those items to the general public my true intent was to share them to my 7 closest friends from high school. I use Google Reader to save time spent reading and recommending news, time I don’t have to waste. Now that it’s a subordinate to Google+, Reader is good as dead to me.

TechCrunch whithers on AOL vine

Standard

And TechCrunch author MG Siegler is appalled:

It has almost been exactly one year since AOL acquired us. At the time, they promised not to interfere with the way we do things. For 11+ months, they’ve kept their word, and things have run beautifully from our end. Our business is one of the few sterling ornaments on their mantel. Now they may break their promise to us. And if that promise is broken, it will break TechCrunch.

via TechCrunch As We Know It May Be Over | TechCrunch

I hopes he’s not shocked and appalled, because this isn’t that surprising at all.

Avis copies from “car sharing” rental car companies

Standard

Avis’ RFID Tracker Turns Companies into Rental Lots

 

I know this may seem like a scoop to some folks, but car share companies like Zip Car and Philly Car Share (now owned by Enterprise) have staked their whole model on this and it has been pretty successful. You can’t mention Avis’ transition to this without mentioning that the airport, train and bus station centered car rental biz feels it needs to adapt the car share distribution model for a segment of its business. Must be something to it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOJ suing to stop AT&T/T-Mobile Merger

Standard

Good. Very good for T-Mobile customers. Extremely good for the At&T and T-Mobile employees that would have been laid off to make cash available for this merger. Good for Android and iPhone users who gobble up data with their phones and tablets.

AT&T needs to focus on upgrading their networks for their customers:

Yesterday a partially-redacted document (pdf) briefly appeared on the FCC website –accidentally posted by a law firm working for AT&T on the $39 billion T-Mobile deal (somewhere there’s a paralegal looking for work today). While AT&T engaged in damage control telling reporters that the document contained no new information — our review of the doc shows that’s simply not true. Data in the letter undermines AT&T’s primary justification for the massive deal, while highlighting how AT&T is willing to pay a huge premium simply to reduce competition and keep T-Mobile out of Sprint’s hands.

There is no damn reason an iPhone shouldn’t work in NYC. Yet if you talk to many AT&T iPhone users, all too often, they can’t stay on a call unless they stand in a specific spot in their apartment or at their office. Instead of upgrading their network for US$3.9b, AT&T rather buy T-Mobile for US$39b to knee cap growth opportunities for Sprint.